>Paul J. Lucas wrote:
>>> And, in the meantime, the signal-to-noise ratio is so bad that
>>> it drives some listeners out because they simply don't have time
>>> to wade through the off-topic stuff to find the on-topic stuff.
>>I wish you would stop calling stuff off topic because its you who are
>>going to discourage people from participating. You seem to have gotten
>>the wrong idea. This newsgroup is not just about Rainbow Gatherings.
>>Other things we Rainbows are interested in are not off topic. What you
>>seem to want is a group just for One Topic: Rainbow gatherings. I think
>>that's beautiful and there's nothing stopping you from starting one, but
>>I don't think you are correct in your assumption that this is it.
[snip]
>>I'm starting to feel like I'm not welcome here and I'm very carefull to
>>never go where I'm not welcome.
[snip]
>> Rodeo Red
>No way!!! Not true, Rodeo Red!
>
>> I'm concerned that there may be other
>>people with other intrests who won't post because they have read your
>>(Paul's) misinformation.
><snip>
>
>Yep. I would be so sorry if folks read Paul's posts and thought that was
>the "Rainbow party line" - of which we know, there is none!!
>
><snip>
>HO! HO! HO! :-D
>
>Spring
I don't know what this guy Paul is about, but he come to grips with the
fact that this is a FREE newgroup, and, if he don't like it, he ought to
subscribe to some other newsgroup, or else just stop adding to the
nonsensical clutter here.
Thomas