At 04:34 PM 10/26/97 GMT, Varactacap wrote:
>There must be some legal mumbo jumbo that can be incorporated into any
message
> regarding the likely location of a gathering which can absolve people
who
> provide info on the location of gatherings of any responsibility for
the
> existance of the gathering.
Don't forget, legal mumbo jumbo can cut both ways ... and your most
august government is a master of using it to cut deeply. If you don't
think they've already thought about legal mumbo jumbo "incorporated [by
ANYBODY] into any message regarding the location of a gathering," check
out:
http://prop1.org/rainbow/cases/florida/usvrb.htm
--->>> scroll down until you come to the part that says:
<paraindent><param>left</param>
"C. Enjoin the defendants and their officers, employees, agents,
servants, contractors, and attorneys, and all those acting in concert
with
them, from attending, conducting or participating in any way in a
gathering
within the National Forests in the states of Florida and elsewhere in
the
United States in violation of the group use regulations."
</paraindent>What do you think, did they forget ANYBODY?
How about that part in the 10/23 article that says:
<paraindent><param>left</param> "Trucilla said the judge's decision is
more far-reaching than the amount the fine might imply.
"'The object was to get a judgment, supported by the facts, that would
uphold the regulation, to ensure its enforcement,' he said today."
</paraindent>Have a nice gathering!