Re: SHOULD WE DO OCALA?

W.V.BILL (billbwv@intrepid.net)
Sat, 25 Oct 1997 09:13:52 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul J. Lucas: "Re: I thought this was about gatherings"
Previous message: Kirk Wattles: "Re: fs final report"
Maybe in reply to: bev and pat: "SHOULD WE DO OCALA?"
Next in thread: X989@aol.com: "Re: SHOULD WE DO OCALA?"

k42r wrote:
>
> Dwolfe: You said, "which one of you left scottie here last year???..."
> Can't say who, just why:
>
> Reason number 10: We thought you needed him.
> Reason number 9: We didn't want to take ALL the guitar players back
> up north with us. .
> Reason number 8: We didn't know if it would be legal to move him
> across state lines.
> Reason number 7: Sorry about that, we didn't think you'd notice.
> Reason number 6: We needed the space in the van for Harmonica Tom's
> harmonicas.
> Reason number 5: The Krishna's down there expressed an interest
> in him.
> Reason number 4: We thought it was Babs' turn to watch him.
> Reason number 3: We knew there wouldn't be enough zu zu's on the
> return trip and did not want to depress him.
> Reason number 2: When legal work gets boring, he likes tie empty
> gallon jugs together.
> Reason number 1: To get even, he might just leave US down there
> this year!
>
> Peace Ken 42RLOVE YOUR WRITING KEN.I HOPE TO SEE YOU AT THANKGIVING ....BILL....

Next message: Paul J. Lucas: "Re: I thought this was about gatherings"
Previous message: Kirk Wattles: "Re: fs final report"
Maybe in reply to: bev and pat: "SHOULD WE DO OCALA?"
Next in thread: X989@aol.com: "Re: SHOULD WE DO OCALA?"

Back to the Top Level: